• Contact Us
  • Student Login
  • My Cart

LSAT and Law School Admissions Blog

You are here: Home / Conditional Reasoning / Conditional Diagramming Part IV: Working with “Only”

April 1, 2016

Conditional Diagramming Part IV: Working with “Only”

Conditional Diagramming Part 4

We are continuing our Conditional Diagramming discussion today with the word “only” which is used frequently in LSAT questions. “Only” is a necessary condition indicator, and its usage is often easy to parse. Here’s an example:

Only doctors carry malpractice insurance.

“Only” modifies “doctors,” and thus the proper diagram is:

Carry malpractice insurance → doctor

However, in a number of instances, “only” is used in a way that is more deceptive. In those cases it can be difficult to determine the proper relationship. The classic example is when “only” modifies a term that refers to a later, separated portion of the sentence; when this occurs, “only” doesn’t modify the term physically closest to it in the sentence. Consider this example:

The only way to the top of the mountain is the switchback trail

In this case, “only” modifies “way,” and thus whatever the “way” is will be the necessary condition. Of course, “way” modifies “trail,” and thus the correct diagram is:

Top of mountain → switchback trail

So, if you see someone on top of the mountain, then according to the author they took the switchback trail. On the other hand, if someone took the switchback trail, does that mean they got to the top of the mountain? No, so switchback trail is not a sufficient condition. Note how tricky this is: “only” is actually physically closest to the term “top of the mountain,” but that’s not the term that “only” is modifying. So, just because “only” is close to a condition doesn’t mean it is actually attached to that condition; you need to make sure that it actually refers to that condition.

Here’s another example:

The only people who drink are those who smoke:

“Only” modifies “people,” and “people” in this case refers to those who smoke. Therefore, the correct diagram is:

Drink → Smoke

If this is still confusing, one way to think about this presentation is that the phrase “the only” is equal to a sufficient condition. In all other cases (that is, when “the” is not in front of “only”), “only” operates as a necessary condition indicator.

More on Conditional Diagramming

  • “Or” in the Sufficient Condition
  • “And” in the Necessary Condition
  • “If But Only If” in Logical Reasoning Questions
  • Advantages of the Unless Equation
FacebookTweetPinEmail

Posted by Dave Killoran / Conditional Reasoning, LSAT Prep / Conditional Reasoning, Diagramming, Logical Reasoning, LSAT Prep Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Attend a PowerScore Webinar!

Popular Posts

  • Podcast Episode 168: The 2025 US News Law School Rankings
  • Podcast Episode 167: April 2025 LSAT Recap
  • Podcast Episode 166: LSAT Faceoff: Dave and Jon Debate Five Common Test Concerns
  • Podcast Episode 165: February 2025 LSAT Recap
  • Podcast Episode 164: State of the LSAT Union: 2024 Recap and 2025 Preview

Categories

  • Pinterest
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!