• Contact Us
  • Student Login
  • My Cart

LSAT and Law School Admissions Blog

You are here: Home / LSAT Prep / Jumping from 165 to 173: The Last Mile is Always the Hardest

October 29, 2016

Jumping from 165 to 173: The Last Mile is Always the Hardest

Jumping from 165 to 173 The Last Mile is Always the Hardest

Getting from the 90th percentile on the LSAT to the 99th percentile is perhaps the most difficult “jump” you can make. Many high-scoring test-takers get stuck in the mid-160’s, seemingly unable to move up. Why? For one thing, they probably reached their score relatively quickly – within a few months, or even less.

The 150’s

Indeed, if you started in the mid-to-low 150’s, all you needed to do is learn how to tackle the major game types, improve your Reading Comprehension speed a bit, and master the fundamental concepts in Logical Reasoning. As long as you develop a strong conceptual understanding of the material, your score was certain to increase.

With the right study regimen, you gradually became more efficient in how you tackled the various question types, improved your overall section strategy and time management, and saw your scores creep up. There is a lot of low-hanging fruit on the LSAT, so to speak, which is why many test-takers mistakenly assume that they can maintain their initial rate of increase throughout their studies.

The 160’s

Unfortunately, once they reach the mid-160s, a lot of students hit a plateau. It goes without saying that, generally speaking, the more ambitious your target score is, the more effort it will take to get there.

Oftentimes, the amount of effort it takes to get from the mid-160s to the low-170s is exponentially greater than the amount of effort it took to get this far. In other words, while absolutely doable, you will probably see diminishing returns on your investment: a 10-point jump may have taken only a month in the beginning.

Once you hit the mid-160s, it could take another two months to jump half as much! Roughly 10% of the LR questions on your test will classify as “very difficult.” Additionally, one out of every four games (and one out of every four RC passages) will be similarly difficult. To get a score in the 170’s, you cannot afford to miss more than a handful of these questions. That’s when students often seek professional help – through online instruction, tutoring, or a combination of both – in order to identify and fix specific gaps in their skill set or knowledge base.

A Confession

Occasionally, however, getting those few extra points is easier than you would expect. Here’s a confession I need to make. I only started scoring in the high-170’s when I stopped trying to get a 180! I’m a stubborn person, and an even more stubborn test-taker. I hate quitting, especially after sinking (what seems like) a lot of time into a particularly challenging Logical Reasoning question. It’s a sunk cost, which used to make me terribly unhappy.

So I would keep throwing good money after bad, not realizing that the probability of getting the question right after the first 1:45 min decreases substantially. (Good thing I don’t gamble or I’d lose my shirt). In the end, even if I got the question right, the opportunity cost of solving that question was invariably higher than the potential benefit (a single point), as I would often end up guessing on a handful of questions at the end of the section.

The Scoring Scale Is Forgiving

After getting burned a few times, it was time to admit that as hard as I tried, I probably could not get every single question right. Thankfully, I did not need to: I could miss 1-2 questions and still get a 180; I could miss as many as 10 questions and still score in the 170’s. The LSAT scoring scale is incredibly forgiving, for one simple reason: this is an incredibly challenging test!

So, don’t obsess over your target score: you may be improving without even realizing it. It is counterproductive to worry about your pace to the exclusion of everything else. This almost always leads to rushing, which invariably lowers your score. Focus on the process, and let it do its magic. When you really feel stuck, give yourself a break and move on! You will thank yourself later for it.

FacebookTweetPinEmail

Posted by PowerScore Test Prep / LSAT Prep / LSAT Prep, Score Increase Leave a Comment

  • Lionel
    October 30, 2015 at 7:16am

    Hi! I plan to take the December test but I need to improve my score by 15 points as I am at 140 now. Do you think, I can improve by then or I should change the test date to February? I have 30-35 hours per week allocate for LSAT.
    Also, how many timed practice tests do you recommend until December? 12?
    Thanks!

  • Nicolay Siclunov
    October 30, 2015 at 4:20pm

    Hi Lionel,

    With 30-35 hours/week devoted to the LSAT, I see no reason why you shouldn’t improve by at least 15 points. To get from 140 to 155, you need to get about 25 more questions right. Doing so will require identifying the sections (and question types) that are costing you the most points, as well as improving your overall conceptual understanding of the material. You will also need to improve your pace, as I suspect you’re losing a lot of points from having to guess on some (or all) of the sections. Most of these 25 points will come from collecting the “low-hanging fruit” I mentioned in my post: roughly 60% of the questions in LR (and at least 50% of the questions in RC/LG) can reasonably be considered below-average in difficulty. A prep test course – even a weekend course – may be just what you need to get those fundamentals in check.
    Let us know if we can help, and good luck!

    Nikki

  • ةmustafa abdulmalek
    November 16, 2015 at 4:30am

    my question to you Николай I am not a native English speaker and although my English is very good and I’m good generally with languages I guess since I learned to speak Russian in 6 months ,so is it possible that I can get in 170s? my weakness is Reading comprehension and my main problem is the time .what can help me and what is the best way to get better or very good at reading comprehension ?
    Regards,

  • Nicolay Siclunov
    November 16, 2015 at 5:47pm

    Hi Mustafa,

    Thanks for your question! As you probably guessed, I am not a native speaker myself, which made the RC section particularly challenging in the beginning. Timely completion of that section is an issue for native and non-native speakers alike, but probably not for the reasons you might expect. While it could certainly help, you don’t need to be a fast reader to get through the passages. What you need to do is stay engaged with the passage and understand the key elements that you’re likely going to be tested on. A lot of what you read will ultimately prove irrelevant to answering any of the questions, and so if you spent too long trying to understand every minute detail in the passage, then you probably wasted your time.

    Our method of approach (also known as the VIEWSTAMP method) isolates the key elements in each passage and represents the optimal way of attacking the questions that follow. It is described at length in the Reading Comprehension Bible, and also in our LSAT courses:

    http://shop.powerscore.com/?action=productDetail&id=a08E000000O2WMsIAN

    Also, check out the following Blog articles that address the question you raise from different angles:

    http://blog.powerscore.com/lsat/bid/308376/Bored-with-Reading-Comprehens…

    http://blog.powerscore.com/lsat/bid/308316/Reading-Comprehension-on-the-…

    http://blog.powerscore.com/lsat/prephrasing-on-the-lsat-reading-comprehe…

    http://blog.powerscore.com/lsat/lsat-reading-comprehension-passage-diagr…

    http://blog.powerscore.com/lsat/a-timing-strategy-for-faster-reading-com…

    Hope this gives you a good place to start! RC can be fun if you give it a chance! Give it a try 🙂

    Nikki

  • Katelyn Tiller
    July 26, 2017 at 2:59am

    Hello!
    I am consistently scoring at a 158/9 and want to improve my score at least to 165. I take the September 16 LSAT in about 3 months and I have been studying since January, but not ‘hard-core’ until June. I seem to be at a standstill with my score. I also have a problem with being good with something on one day and horrible at it the next! Is this jump possible? Do you have any tips for increasing it?
    Katelyn

  • Dave Killoran
    July 29, 2017 at 12:28am

    Hi Katelyn,

    Thanks for the question! The nice thing here is that you aren’t too far away from your goal, and as you rise on the scale, it becomes easier to move up because it takes fewer questions to rise each scaled point.

    Your score plateau and inconsistency are likely related to the same sources, which are holes in your test knowledge and approach. That sounds a bit harsh, so please let me explain 🙂 First, the LSAT tests a wide variety of areas each time, which makes some test better fro you and some worse. I talk about that here: http://blog.powerscore.com/lsat/bid/310634/welcome-to-the-lsat-casino. For students who aren’t 100% on the fundamentals or who aren’t machine-like in their approach, these variations in exams often reveal themselves in varying performances. LR is great on one test, but then not so great on the next while LG seems to do the same thing, but on different tests. You fix it by doing the following:

    1. Make sure you really know the concepts and techniques. For example, can you diagram LG rules without thinking, do you know all the standard inferences, or do you know all the ways to break down causality in LR, and so on. Instant execution with no delays is your goal.

    2. You look at questions repeatedly until they are second nature. Review, review, review. Stumble on a question? Look at it again a few days later. Get to know questions so well you could teach it to your friends without missing a beat, and without stumbling over any of the ideas.

    The above is work, I know, but it’s also the one proven way to break through the barrier you are up against. You have to make this test your friend and try to learn as much as possible about it.

    Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks!

  • Amy Gomez
    October 02, 2017 at 7:09pm

    Hi,

    I took the powerscore course over the summer, it was very useful, but I seem to hit a plateau about a month after the course. When I finished the course, I was at a 160. Before the September LSAT, I was scoring at a 165. I would like to re-take in December and try to get a 170.

    How realistic is that goal?

    My RC is usually a raw of 23-25. I have more variation in LR usually 19-21. My LG is the lowest, typically with a raw of 18. I was told by my instructor to skip a game in order increase my accuracy. I feel comfortable with the concepts and games, but I am struggling in increasing my speed. Any suggestions? I’d like to start going for that fourth game.

    Regarding LR. I do notice that I struggle with consistent pre-phrasing as well as certain questions such as: MOR, Parallel, Must be true/most strongly supported, and assumption questions. Would you suggest I focus exclusively on these areas or do a more holistic review of LR first and then return to question specific study?

    Any suggestions or advice you may have are greatly appreciated.

    All the best,

    Amy

  • Dave Killoran
    October 03, 2017 at 10:09pm

    Hi Amy,

    Thanks for the questions! I’m going to post a few thoughts here, and then if we keep talking I might have us jump the conversation over to our forum (https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/) since the interface there is better for discussions, and questions in this vein come up over there with some frequency.

    Your goal is realistic, although with time passing you want to put in as much time now as you can spare. Here are my thoughts on your different sections:

    LG: Go for the 4th game! As a short-term strategy, there are clearly times when skipping a game is a good idea. But, if you are shooting for 170, there’s no room for that so I would immediately begin preparing to do all 4 games. I would still choose the games to do in an order that’s best for you, so that hopefully the last game you do is also the hardest of the four games.

    This link goes to a post I wrote about LG speed: https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic.php?t=14551

    LR: If your RC is that good, then your LR should be better. The holdup is clearly not your reading ability, so it must be in your knowledge of the concepts and of what they want in each question. That can be learned!! And once you learn those elements, your score variability will decrease.

    You mention prephrasing struggles, and some of the types you mention are typically strong prephrase types. So, I would go back the holistic view of those types first, and then secondly into the answer choices. For example, a close study of Method answers shows you how different they are; what is it about the right answers that you’ve missed, and what about the wrong answers has been attractive? Could you go back to each question you’ve missed so far and teach it to me if I asked you to? If the answer is no, that means you didn’t review those missed questions to the proper degree. My rule for students is that you are only done with a question once you can successfully explain it to someone else. That should be your standard as well!

    With Parallel and Assumption Defenders, you can’t really prephrase, although you can prepare by knowing the form of argumentation (Parallel) and the relationship of premises to conclusion (Assumption).

    I would also suggest looking through some of my posts at https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewforum.php?f=2. I talk frequently about preparing for the LSAT, and I think you’d benefit from seeing those various discussions and the advice given therein.

    Please let me know what you think. Thanks!

  • Amy Gomez
    October 05, 2017 at 5:14pm

    Hi Dave!

    Thanks for the advice! I will definitely try assessing my conceptual abilities on LR more. I know there have been questions where I think I get it but I would not be able to explain it adequately. I will start a more thorough review of those.

    Any tips for conditional reasoning LR problems? Diagramming helps me, but I feel that I spend way too much time on those questions. I don’t always diagram conditionals, but the ones I do diagram tend to take a bit of time, and I am not always confident in my answer. On LR I also find that my time on the first 10 questions are close to the 12 min mark. I know those are easy questions, yet I have quite a difficult start. At this point, I’m struggling to see if its a self-fulling prophesy or a genuine struggle. Often I miss 2 of the first 10, and when I move on to the next 10, I will get them all right though I spend the same amount of time.

    Lastly, grouping games tend to be my slowest and most error-prone. Any tips there? Undefined grouping games are generally the hardest for me to tackle. Do you suggest I start doing the games out of order? I usually follow the order since I have established that I want to get to all 4 games, I feel that I waste time by reading the scenario and doing the set-up only to skip the game and re-read once I return.

    Thanks for the advice! I’d be happy to move the conversation to the powerscore forum if that helps!!

    Amy

  • Jon Denning
    October 06, 2017 at 7:52pm

    Hi Amy – jumping into the conversation here as I know Dave is deep into 2018 Bible updates and I want to make sure your questions get answered quickly 🙂

    Let me take a crack at your concerns by actually tackling them from the bottom up:

    First, the Forum is likely your best bet, less because you’ll get “better” service over there but more so because of how many useful discussions already exist on these exact topics! There are dozens and dozens of threads on how to improve your conditional reasoning skills, move more quickly with diagrams, and conquer Grouping games in an efficient and confident manner (as well as prephrasing and a number of other concerns from your first post), so I feel certain that some time spent browsing relevant content on the Forum will be a huge help for you. So that’s my step 1 if I’m you!

    As for the games, two things:

    1. Even the best takers (or, perhaps, *especially* the best takers) are always looking to get an edge in the section by doing the four games in the order that best suits them, so an emphatic YES to potentially doing the games in a different order than that presented. Or, as I often put it to students, what are the odds that the test makers—the people hoping to make this as challenging as possible—consistently arrange the four games in the optimal order for students? Clearly, not great. Ditto the questions within each game. So be agile! Nimble! Pick and choose the order that’s most suitable to your strengths and preferences, rather than committing to the sequence given. Plan to do all four (as Dave correctly suggests), but not necessarily 1, 2, 3, 4 every time. If you know come test day that Grouping is usually still your worst type, then as soon as you see a Grouping game (particularly pure grouping with a ton of conditionality, as you note) skip it. Save it for last. That’s how smart test takers behave.

    2. Given that Grouping tends to present the most difficulty for you, and coupled with your prior paragraph about conditional reasoning struggles, it seems highly likely that you need more practice with sufficient and necessary constructs. Those are very often at the heart of Grouping games, as you know, so the difficulty here seems consistent between LR and LG. The upside is that as you improve in LR conditionality you’ll see your Grouping performance improve, and vice versa. But make general practice with those types of questions/games a priority now: conditional reasoning is too prevalent a form to risk any weakness or deficiency on test day. Go back to the relevant lessons (starting with Lesson 2) and work through the conceptual material asap, and then return to any/all questions and games featuring conditionality you’ve worked on and redo them. Twice, three times if needed…whatever it takes for you to feel entirely clear on how they’re best attacked and solved. Then, once that’s accomplished, move on to new content with conditionality and work through it. Over and over until it’s rock solid.

    The volume of material that came as part of your course is likely sufficient to get you where you want to go, but if you’re looking for even more—and not to push a product, but…—one great tool for this type of isolated drilling is our Workbook collection: https://www.powerscore.com/lsat/publications/#lsatprep. Both the LR and LG workbooks have a lot of conditional practice sets in them that allow you an intermediate phase between pure, conceptual breakdown and actual test content. They could be a big help if you’ve run through all of the course content a few times and still need a final push.

    Which brings me to your first question about LR, and two final points:

    1. For conditional questions, I encourage students to experiment with diagramming, as in: diagram frequently but then always consider post-question whether you truly needed the diagram (how much did it help you?) and from that begin to whittle down your diagramming commitments to the necessary minimum. Diagrams are fine, but they’re also time-consuming…so they’re an investment. And like any investment you want it to return more than it cost. So good/smart diagrams will pay you back for the time spent either in clarity of understanding or answer choice analysis speed (or both). Couple that mentality and perspective with more practice (as I note above) and you’ll find that you strike the right balance more and more often, and regularly find success in solving as well. There’s no single, right answer for everyone about how much is ideal (aside from the broad “as little as possible to still be fast and accurate”) so you’ll have to simply play with it until you find your own proper Goldilocks zone, so to speak 🙂

    2. Your pace, and from the sound of it overall accuracy, seems entirely fine here. My suspicion is that you’re simply a little…call it “loose” (maybe a touch careless) in the first 10 and giving away a question or two as a result. So take a moment as you start an LR section to consider your mindset and to focus, really tighten up the process to reduce the chances of a silly mistake to as close to zero as possible. Perhaps even do some light warm up beforehand to make sure you’re dialed in and ready to rock (I talk a bit about warmups here, if interested: https://www.reddit.com/r/LSAT/comments/6tfq2n/warmup_before_practice_tests/).

    And, again, practice! That’s the single biggest takeaway from all of this frankly: you need to just keep at it, first with an eye to the sections as a whole as Dave notes, then with an extreme emphasis on these known points of struggle.

    I hope that helps!

  • Bridget Fassano
    October 12, 2017 at 3:59am

    Hi! I just received my lsat score and I had studied on my own completely, since I could not afford a tutor or course. This was my first time taking it and I was a little disappointed because I scored a 153. My goal was 160 or above. I have never been great at standardized tests, but my grades are next to perfect. Do you think it is possible to increase my score by 10 points for the next test in December?
    Thanks for your advice in advance.

  • Jon Denning
    October 13, 2017 at 5:43am

    Hi Bridget – thanks for the message! A 153 is a perfectly normal place to start so no shame in that, and you now have the experience of a real test under your belt which is helpful! And I definitely think an improvement of the type you’re looking for is possible! A lot of it will come down to two things though: how you choose to continue preparing, and your mindset on test day next time.

    For the first, be sure to do all that you can to ensure your score goes up! I know prep can be expensive, but gaining another 7-10 points would drastically change your future both in terms of school and scholarship opportunities, so it’s hard to overstate the value. Think of prep as an investment (much like law school), where even a couple hundred dollars can return tens of thousands in future job prospects and tuition discounts. We see it every day.

    That’s not a sales pitch per se, and I hope it doesn’t sound like one, but with near-perfect grades you’ve got an opportunity to go to a great school if you get that score up. So for your second attempt be sure to get some solid prep books like our Bibles if you didn’t use those previously (which can be had on a budget for sure), or even enroll into our On Demand Course on its subscription plan, meaning you’ll never pay for more/longer than you need: https://www.powerscore.com/lsat/courses/on-demand/ . You have a foundation established now, so you may not need to spend $1000 like some people on a full course or tutor package…but if you can get into some sort of organized, comprehensive program like the On Demand I think you’ll find it’s well worth it.

    For the second about mindset, to make the kind of gains you’re looking for–especially if you feel standardized tests aren’t a strong suit–start working immediately to improve your mental toughness. One of the best resources for this is a blog post that Dave Killoran put together with a ton of free links/articles/videos and assorted advice on how great test takers act and think: http://blog.powerscore.com/lsat/5-days-to-the-lsat-the-ultimate-test-men…

    I can’t recommend highly enough beginning to go through that content now! It’ll make a big difference, and give you your best possible shot at crushing it on the real thing.

    I hope this helps! If you have any questions about continued prep please let us know!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Attend a PowerScore Webinar!

Popular Posts

  • Podcast Episode 168: The 2025 US News Law School Rankings
  • Podcast Episode 167: April 2025 LSAT Recap
  • Podcast Episode 166: LSAT Faceoff: Dave and Jon Debate Five Common Test Concerns
  • Podcast Episode 165: February 2025 LSAT Recap
  • Podcast Episode 164: State of the LSAT Union: 2024 Recap and 2025 Preview

Categories

  • Pinterest
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!