• Contact Us
  • Student Login
  • My Cart

LSAT and Law School Admissions Blog

You are here: Home / LSAT Prep / Quantity or Quality?: A 2-Week Study Decision

January 11, 2019

Quantity or Quality?: A 2-Week Study Decision

Quantity or Quality? A 2-Week Study Decision

So, your LSAT is fast approaching. Now, more than ever, you’re more eager to maximize the value of their remaining study time. That’s exactly what I’m here to discuss. How do you, with only two weeks and a mountain of materials, get the most out of the days ahead.

Last Minute Game Plan

There is a key to effective practice, particularly with time constraints. Recognize that the volume of work is less important than the insights that work can provide. You don’t need to go through everything in your arsenal to prepare, just focus on the most important pieces. The truth is, any time I elaborate on the specifics of the idea of “proper practice,” it occurs to me that at the core of effective studying is the process of comprehensive performance review and self-analysis. What follows is a breakdown of those concepts. Take these ideas to heart as you continue with your preparations and reflect upon them often in the coming weeks.

The tendency to relentlessly push forward, doing section after section and LSAT after LSAT, without self-awareness or self-reflection can be to your detriment. It can lead to a lot of anxiety and frustration over score plateaus. This becomes particularly compounded when the exam is just days away. If you’re thinking, “I did 50 LR questions and only got half right, I should do another 50,” you could be hurting your progress. That’s no way to make improvements!

Take Time to Reflect

Instead, when you find yourself struggling, stop and take a detailed look at what’s going wrong. Even if it’s a small sample of performance like a single passage or game, take time to reflect. Have a conversation with yourself and figure out a game plan. For example, a game crushed you. Go back to the beginning and see what you should have done differently. As yourself some questions.

  • Did you identify the variable sets correctly?
  • Pick the right base?
  • Recognize the numerical distribution?
  • Diagram each of those rules properly?
  • See their connections and the inferences that would result?
  • Was all the above done in a reasonable amount of time?
  • Could you have gone faster?
  • With each of those questions, did you recognize the type?
  • How could you have found the correct answer more quickly?

Essentially, find out the source of your difficulties. Figure out why it caused you trouble and how to respond differently when you’re inevitably faced with it again.

To answer those questions, return to the conceptual discussion of the thing being tested. Filter your analysis of what you did through the conceptual framework of how it’s supposed to be done. Look back at relevant content in your study materials to ensure you fully understand the underlying nature of the subject. Return to the specific source of difficulty and reevaluate it based on your improved comprehension of its conceptual basis.

Once you’ve satisfactorily answered each of those things for yourself, move to a fresh example of the concept or idea. Now, try again. This time with an intense focus on a better application of how it should be done. This should lead to:

  1. Gradual, but consistent improvements over time. You’re getting better at recognizing familiar elements and structures. Applying the appropriate techniques is easier. You can identify when things are going off-kilter so you don’t stray too far from where you want to be.
  2. Immediate rewards in the days before the exam. As you refine and perfect your approach, further establishing the skills you’ll need on test day.

Quality is the Clear Winner

In short, it’s an issue of quantity versus quality. You want quality! Make sure everything you do is given a proper review. Be it something brief or an entire five-section practice test. Take the time to deconstruct it thoroughly and analyze your performance. Look for any possible areas of improvement by comparing what you did with the recommended strategy for that concept. Do not let a limited amount of prep time dissuade you from spending a significant portion of it on self-reflection and review!

Finally, don’t be afraid to start small and build if you still find yourself struggling. If Logical Reasoning is a weakness, an entire practice test with 50 questions is probably not the best use of your time. Instead take a smaller selection of questions, even a single type if you have one that particularly troubles you. Work through those while timing yourself and then follow the process of comprehensive review/analysis described above. The idea is that, with a lot of work already under your belt, you should be able to efficiently address and eliminate these weaknesses. But you need to be precise in approaching them.

I know this can feel tedious and tiresome, but you must have a clear understanding of where you are struggling and why if you want to eliminate your various points of difficulty prior to test day. A thorough, consistent process of self-analysis and review is the most reliable way to do just that.

Last-Minute LSAT Advice

FacebookTweetPinEmail

Posted by Jon Denning / LSAT Prep / LSAT Prep, Practice Prep, Studying Leave a Comment

  • Alicia Mendsey
    May 30, 2018 at 3:51pm

    Thank you for this information and explaining why quality is better. Spending time to reflect on what you did wrong during practice is good.

  • David
    May 30, 2018 at 10:33pm

    This is exactly what I was wondering and I will take only 1 simulated test this week and another test next week!

    Thank you so much!!

  • Madeline Garcia
    October 28, 2018 at 10:22pm

    If i’m working on 30 MBT questions should I: 1) complete all 30 questions and then go through the answer choices one by one and examine what went wrong; or 2) complete a question, check the answer and review it if i got it wrong. Then, continue that process for each of the 30 questions.

  • Jon Denning
    October 29, 2018 at 12:26am

    Hey Madeline – great question! Partly it depends on what you’re trying to do: build stamina, or gauge your understanding of the concept. That is, if you’re looking to grow your endurance (and better replicate test day where you’ll have 20+ questions in a row to tackle) then it’s important to work in bulk, meaning doing full question sets under timed conditions before stopping to review your work or check your answers.

    Most people doing exercises like the one you describe–a bunch of questions all of the same type–are more interested in improving their skills and conceptual understanding, meaning do fewer questions, review your responses untimed to see how you still feel about them (as described above, and here: https://blog.powerscore.com/lsat/how-to-review-lsat-problem-sets), then check your answers and see how you did. So maybe 4-6 questions at a time. If you’re doing well, then keep going: tackle the next set of 5 or so and repeat the process. If you’re struggling then make sure you understand what’s going wrong and why before attempting additional questions! That way you don’t burn through all your content doing things the wrong way, or reinforce bad habits and misunderstandings.

    Hope that helps!

About Jon Denning

Jon Denning is PowerScore's Vice President and oversees product creation and instructor training for all of the exam services PowerScore offers. He is also a Senior Instructor with 99th percentile scores on the LSAT, GMAT, GRE, SAT, and ACT.

Jon is widely regarded as one of the world's foremost authorities on LSAT preparation, and for the past decade has assisted thousands of students in the law school admissions process. He has also created/co-created a number of PowerScore’s LSAT courses and publications, including the Reading Comprehension Bible, the In Person, Live Online, and On Demand LSAT Courses, the Advanced Logic Games Course, the Advanced Logical Reasoning Course, and a number of books in PowerScore’s popular LSAT Deconstructed Series.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Attend a PowerScore Webinar!

Popular Posts

  • Podcast Episode 168: The 2025 US News Law School Rankings
  • Podcast Episode 167: April 2025 LSAT Recap
  • Podcast Episode 166: LSAT Faceoff: Dave and Jon Debate Five Common Test Concerns
  • Podcast Episode 165: February 2025 LSAT Recap
  • Podcast Episode 164: State of the LSAT Union: 2024 Recap and 2025 Preview

Categories

  • Pinterest
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!