In Part 2, we discuss two questions that specifically deal with Weaken and Assumption in correlation and causal reasoning questions on the LSAT. In the final part in this series, let’s go over those questions. Be sure to read Part 1 and 2 in the series before diving in.
Let’s start by revisiting the first question.
Advertisement: Pump3D is a nutritional supplement that can greatly reduce athletes’ fatigue after anaerobic exercise. This was shown by a study investigating the relationship between fatigue and high doses of guarana extract—the main ingredient in Pump3D—which showed that people who regularly take guarana extract supplements have a significantly lower level of fatigue after anaerobic exercise than people who do not take the supplement.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument in the advertisement?
- Guarana extract supplements tend to reduce slightly athletes’ endurance and stamina during aerobic exercise.
- People who regularly consume guarana extract supplements tend to be professional athletes, who rarely experience fatigue after exercise.
- Guarana extract is only one of several ingredients in Pump3D.
- The reduction in fatigue due to the consumption of guarana extract is no greater than the reduction due to other nutritional supplements.
- Guarana extract taken in the form of supplements has a different effect on the body than does guarana extract taken in food.
Answer and Analysis
The key to weakening an LSAT argument is to focus on the conclusion. It’s essential to break down the argument. The conclusion is the first sentence in the stimulus. It’s in support of which the author describes the results of one particular study (“this is shown by” is a premise indicator):
Premise: People who regularly take guarana extract supplements have a significantly lower level of fatigue after anaerobic exercise than people who do not take the supplement.
Premise: Guarana extract is the main ingredient in Pump3D.
Conclusion: Pump3D can greatly reduce athletes’ fatigue after anaerobic exercise.
The advertisement’s conclusion is based on a questionable assumption since the study only establishes a correlation between lower level of fatigue and guarana supplementation. While there are many ways of attacking the conclusion, most will require undermining the reliability of the study or experiment.
First, was the study properly controlled? Are we sure the subjects who didn’t take guarana supplementation had the same baseline fitness level as those who did? Second, do we have reason to suspect taking supplements would have a placebo effect? Perhaps the placebo would influence the study group to overestimate just how much their fatigue was reduced. Third, is it possible that the researchers themselves have a bias in favor of discovering the sought-after effect?
We can also weaken the argument by questioning whether the causal relationship can be explained by a third, independent factor. What if people who typically experience a lower level of fatigue because of a third, unrelated factor (above-average fitness level, other nutritional supplements, etc.) also tend to take Pump3D? This would imply an alternate cause for the observed effect and agrees most closely with answer choice (B).
Answer Choice (A)
This answer is incorrect because the scope of the argument is limited to the effects of guarana supplementation on anaerobic exercise alone. The effect on aerobic exercise would only be relevant if the conclusion extended to include other forms of exercise. Be aware of argument scope, and avoid weakening a more general version of the conclusion than the one presented.
Answer Choice (B), the Correct Answer
Recall that the advertisement’s conclusion is based upon a questionable assumption. The study only establishes a correlation between a lower level of fatigue and guarana supplementation. What if subjects who took guarana extract didn’t have the same baseline fitness level as those who did? Then the study was not properly controlled. This, in turn, opens up the possibility of an alternative interpretation for the observed correlation. Rather than arguing that guarana reduces fatigue, it is now possible that some third factor is causally related. Let’s, for example, consider if a subject is a professional athlete. It’s possible they experience a lower level of fatigue because they’re an athlete and they regularly consume guarana extract.
Answer Choice (C)
Answer choice (C) may seem attractive, because we know that guarana extract is only one of several ingredients in Pump3D. However, we cannot weaken what we do not know. It’s entirely possible that other ingredients in Pump3D are inactive, or that they only intensify the stimulating effects of guarana.
Answer Choice (D)
Answer choice (D) is perhaps the most attractive incorrect answer choice. If the reduction in fatigue due to the consumption of guarana is no greater than the reduction due to other nutritional supplements, this suggests that guarana is not the only (or best) way to reduce fatigue. Other nutritional supplements work just as well. This doesn’t weaken the conclusion, however, which only argues that a nutritional supplement containing guarana can greatly reduce athletes’ fatigue. The author never claimed that Pump3D would be the best (or the only) way to reduce fatigue. Even if another supplement is as good (or better), as long as Pump3D works as advertised the argument still stands.
Answer Choice (E)
This one is incorrect because it plays upon the common belief that supplements are not the “real thing. Read closely! The study examined subjects who took nutritional supplements containing guarana extract, making it reasonable to draw a conclusion about the effects of a similar supplement, such as Pump3D. Had the study examined the effects of guarana when taken with food, this answer choice would have been a reasonable objection to the conclusion.
Now, let’s take a look at the second question we presented previously.
Which one of the following is an assumption the argument requires?
- The belief that a nutritional supplement would have a certain effect can sometimes produce that effect.
- Those who regularly take guarana extract do not undertake unusually strenuous exercise regimens that are otherwise conducive to experiencing fatigue.
- People who avoid taking nutritional supplements are not more likely to have a healthy, well-balanced diet that combats fatigue.
- People who regularly take guarana extract are not significantly more likely than those who do not to consume caffeine, a known stimulant that decreases fatigue.
- Consuming guarana extract has few serious side effects.
Answer and Analysis
Knowing potential flaws in an author’s conclusion is immensely helpful in identifying an assumption upon which that conclusion is based. The answer you select must contain a statement upon which the argument depends. Namely, a statement that is necessary for the conclusion to be true.
Typically, if you see a major weakness in an argument where the author relies on a potentially biased experiment to draw a causal conclusion, look for a Defender assumption answer stating that the study was properly controlled. As always, prove the correct answer choice by using the Assumption Negation Technique.
If the logical opposite of a given statement weakens the conclusion of the argument, then it must be an assumption upon which the conclusion depends.
Answer Choice (A)
This answer choice describes a placebo effect, which would weaken the argument, not represent an assumption necessary for the argument to be logically valid. Indeed, if the researchers failed to conduct a “blind experiment” where neither the experiment, nor the control group, were aware of what supplement they were taking, then it is entirely possible that those reporting lower levels of fatigue were influenced by their belief that the nutritional supplement would be effective. Since we are not answering a Weaken question, this answer choice is incorrect.
Answer Choice (B)
If people who regularly take guarana extract avoid strenuous exercise, no wonder they feel less fatigued than those who do not take guarana. This answer choice also weakens the argument and is incorrect. You can also analyze this answer choice by examining the effect of its logical opposite. What if those who regularly take guarana do exercise a lot, which typically makes one feel tired? This would only strengthen—not weaken—the conclusion that Pump3D reduces fatigue. Why? Because these subjects must have done something right to counteract the fatigue-inducing effects of rigorous exercise (given that they feel less tired than the control group). That “something” could have been Pump3D, suggesting that the supplement might be effective in reducing fatigue.
Answer Choice (C)
Answer choice (C): This answer choice states that people who avoid taking nutritional supplements are not more likely than those who do to have a healthy, well-balanced diet that combats fatigue. To examine whether this is an assumption, try negating it. What if those who avoid taking nutritional supplements were more likely than others to have a healthy, well-balanced diet that combats fatigue? In that case, we would expect the control group to be experiencing lower levels of fatigue than the experimental group, which is not the case.
In fact, those who consumed guarana were significantly less tired than those who did not. Since we cannot argue with the facts, we are left to conclude that guarana had a positive effect on the subjects who took it, strengthening the conclusion of the argument. The logical opposite of answer choice (C) does not weaken the argument, proving that answer choice (C) is not an assumption upon which that argument depends.
Answer Choice (D), the Correct Answer
Answer choice (D) is the correct answer choice, because its logical opposite weakens the conclusion. What if people who regularly take guarana extract were more likely than others to consume caffeine, for example? Caffeine is a stimulant that decreases fatigue. This suggests that their decreased level of fatigue may be due to an alternate cause—caffeine. This reveals that the study is based on a potentially biased sample. It is no longer possible to claim with absolute certainty that Pump3D can greatly reduce athletes’ fatigue. Their alertness can be due to the consumption of caffeine instead. Since the logical opposite of answer choice (D) weakens the conclusion of the argument, it’s the correct answer.
Answer Choice (E)
Whether guarana consumption has any serious side effects is irrelevant to the question of whether it helps reduce athletes’ fatigue. Even if guarana had many side effects, this would only be of concern if the author recommended or endorsed the consumption of guarana extract. The scope of the argument is much narrower, making answer choice (E) incorrect.
Have any questions? Struggling with correlation and causal reasoning? A tutor will help with all the subjects that are giving you trouble! Fill out an inquiry to match with a tutor and schedule a free consultation.