• Contact Us
  • Student Login
  • My Cart

LSAT and Law School Admissions Blog

You are here: Home / Logical Reasoning / LSAT Tip! Beware of Tips…

August 20, 2016

LSAT Tip! Beware of Tips…

LSAT Tip! Beware of Tips...

It goes without saying that some advice is better than other. But when it comes to the LSAT, unfortunately, bad advice is quite common. This is largely due to the complexity of the exam itself, which does not lend itself easily to quick tips or easy shortcuts. More importantly, you can circumvent shortcuts. And test-makers often do just that. Guess what? They have access to the same test-prep materials as you do. If there is a shortcut they can trick you into using blindly, chances are the shortcut won’t get you very far.

Must Be True Questions

Must Be True questions in Logical Reasoning on the LSAT, at the most basic level, ask you to determine an answer choice that logically follows from the information contained in the stimulus, i.e. that can be proven by reference to the stimulus. The following is a shortcut many students use to eliminate seemingly wrong answer choices:

  • In Must Be True questions, beware of answer choices that contain keywords absent from the stimulus. Because you cannot prove “new information,” such answer choices are always incorrect.

The premise for this tip is valid, but the tip itself isn’t.

Keyword Matching

Why? Because test-makers can easily craft answer choices that employ seemingly new terminology without failing the all-important Prove Test. Keyword matching is generally a bad idea. Take a look at June 2005 LR1, Question 12, or December 2000, LR1, Question 11. In both cases, the correct answer choice makes a declarative statement about a “new element” (“warm bath,” “alcohol”) which is nevertheless provable by the information in the stimulus. This is because the element is always defined in a way that falls within the parameters, or the “umbrella,” of the fact set. So, while the correct answer choice must always be proven by the stimulus, “new keywords” do not necessarily introduce “new information.”

It is arguably easier to follow a quick soundbite than an elaborate test of logical validity. And sometimes, shortcuts do work. But quite often they don’t, leading you down the wrong path.

FacebookTweetPinEmail

Posted by PowerScore Test Prep / Logical Reasoning, LSAT Prep / Logical Reasoning, LSAT Prep Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Attend a PowerScore Webinar!

Popular Posts

  • Podcast Episode 168: The 2025 US News Law School Rankings
  • Podcast Episode 167: April 2025 LSAT Recap
  • Podcast Episode 166: LSAT Faceoff: Dave and Jon Debate Five Common Test Concerns
  • Podcast Episode 165: February 2025 LSAT Recap
  • Podcast Episode 164: State of the LSAT Union: 2024 Recap and 2025 Preview

Categories

  • Pinterest
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!