• Contact Us
  • Student Login
  • My Cart

LSAT and Law School Admissions Blog

You are here: Home / Logical Reasoning / Arguments vs. Facts in Logical Reasoning

July 30, 2016

Arguments vs. Facts in Logical Reasoning

Arguments vs. Facts in Logical Reasoning

Recognizing Argumentation

One of the most important tasks facing test takers in the Logical Reasoning section is the ability to accurately identify the presence of argumentation. “Argumentation” can be summed up as an author’s attempt to persuade the reader to believe that the author’s opinion is correct. While that seems simple enough, it’s not always that easy to spot.

Argumentation on the LSAT is often in shades of gray as far as degree or obviousness of the opinion given. While many statements appear heavily skewed towards opinion (“I believe that the proposed tax reduction is a good idea”), and many are given as almost purely factual (“Everyone in the room is wearing black shoes”), some seem to fall in the gap between the two. Naturally this presents a challenge in terms of quick classification.

Consider the following sentence. “Heavy rainfall is likely to continue in the coming months.” That seems more opinionated than a simple, factual statement. It deals with thinking something about the future as opposed to knowing something about the past/present (like “today is Thursday”). At the same time it seems more factual than a statement of pure belief, like “We should be grateful for more rain.” The nature of individual statements and their wording play an important role as you seek to make the fact vs. argument distinction.

Context is Key

Another key factor also comes into play: context. A fact is something that is given as true and that you as a test taker can accept as true. A conclusion is something the author feels is true, but that you should scrutinize and question. Accept a fact; challenge a conclusion. The heavy rainfall example could be given as a factual premise (“Heavy rainfall is likely to continue in the coming months”). If we get any more rain our crops will all die. Therefore, our crops will likely die in the coming months.”

Or it could be used as a conclusion (“The first storm of spring indicates that several months of heavy rainfall will immediately follow”). We are currently having our first spring storm. Thus, heavy rainfall is likely to continue in the coming months. The same statement can serve as a fact (premise) or an opinion (conclusion) depending solely on the information surrounding it.

Be wary of trying to categorize everything you encounter into either pure fact or pure argument based only on a single word or sentence. This is a test that usually does not lend itself to absolute, black-and-white categorization on such a limited/confined scale. The specific construction of a statement combined with the surrounding information must be considered before assigning a label like “fact,” “premise,” or “conclusion” to an individual stimulus element.

Question Everything

And even if/when you are able to perfectly assign those labels, a bigger, more important task still exists. Once you recognize something in the form of an argument/opinion, begin to question it. Consider the pieces used to arrive at that opinion (premises) to reveal the validity of the opinion/argument in question. Does it follow perfectly and without doubt from the supporting facts? This is particularly important when the statement is a strong conclusion or clear opinion. If the information in question seems more factual, consider the conclusions that would result from that information being true. This allows you to determine valid inferences that would follow from the facts that you’ve been given.

FacebookTweetPinEmail

Posted by Jon Denning / Logical Reasoning, LSAT Prep / Logical Reasoning, LSAT Prep Leave a Comment

About Jon Denning

Jon Denning is PowerScore's Vice President and oversees product creation and instructor training for all of the exam services PowerScore offers. He is also a Senior Instructor with 99th percentile scores on the LSAT, GMAT, GRE, SAT, and ACT.

Jon is widely regarded as one of the world's foremost authorities on LSAT preparation, and for the past decade has assisted thousands of students in the law school admissions process. He has also created/co-created a number of PowerScore’s LSAT courses and publications, including the Reading Comprehension Bible, the In Person, Live Online, and On Demand LSAT Courses, the Advanced Logic Games Course, the Advanced Logical Reasoning Course, and a number of books in PowerScore’s popular LSAT Deconstructed Series.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Attend a PowerScore Webinar!

Popular Posts

  • Podcast Episode 168: The 2025 US News Law School Rankings
  • Podcast Episode 167: April 2025 LSAT Recap
  • Podcast Episode 166: LSAT Faceoff: Dave and Jon Debate Five Common Test Concerns
  • Podcast Episode 165: February 2025 LSAT Recap
  • Podcast Episode 164: State of the LSAT Union: 2024 Recap and 2025 Preview

Categories

  • Pinterest
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!