PowerScore LSAT Forum Post of the Day: Weakening Concepts and Truth vs. Validity

    LSAT Logic Games | LSAT Logical Reasoning | LSAT Prep | LSAT Forum

    How do you attack assumptions to weaken the argument? Do the three incorrect answers for weakening questions deal with incorrect assumptions or conclusions? Read this discussion between a PowerScore student, Senior Instructor Nikki Siclunov, and Logical Reasoning Bible author Dave Killoran to learn more!

    Here's a quick preview. Make sure to check out the full thread to read the entire explanation Nikki and Dave provided to this student:


    The Forum posts selected for this series are chosen because they have a universal quality to them. In other words, we’ve selected posts that contain information that can be used by test takers of any background and score level. So, although the specific question posed by the students may not be one you have, when our instructors answer they have gone beyond the specific question and brought in broader elements that you can use. Consequently, these posts, and the situations therein, are virtually guaranteed to resonate with you on some level. Make sure to register for the LSAT Forum for free today, and get your own LSAT and Admissions questions answered by a PowerScore expert.

    Questions or comments on the thoughts above? Let us know below!

    Free LSAT Starter Kit